Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Cindy Hyde-Smith opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for strict enforcement of immigration laws. She has expressed strong opposition to DACA and supports measures that enhance border security.
Cindy Hyde-Smith opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for strict enforcement of immigration laws. She has expressed strong opposition to DACA and supports measures that enhance border security.
“No to DACA, breaking immigration laws has consequences.”
Cindy Hyde-Smith opposes legal access to abortion, identifying herself as pro-life. She has voted to prohibit federal funding for organizations that promote abortion services and has expressed strong opposition to Planned Parenthood, calling it "one of the worst things that has ever happened to us."
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Cindy Hyde-Smith opposes legal access to abortion, identifying herself as pro-life. She has voted to prohibit federal funding for organizations that promote abortion services and has expressed strong opposition to Planned Parenthood, calling it "one of the worst things that has ever happened to us."
“Stands behind her 100% pro-life record on abortion issues.”
Hyde-Smith strongly supports the right to bear arms, viewing it as essential to American liberty. She has advocated for measures such as concealed carry for retired police officers and reciprocity across state lines for concealed carry permits.
Hyde-Smith strongly supports the right to bear arms, viewing it as essential to American liberty. She has advocated for measures such as concealed carry for retired police officers and reciprocity across state lines for concealed carry permits.
“Right to bear arms is essential to American Liberty.”
Hyde-Smith opposes a larger government role in health coverage, specifically criticizing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and advocating for its repeal. She supports maintaining protections for preexisting conditions while promoting short-term health insurance plans that may not cover such protections.
Hyde-Smith opposes a larger government role in health coverage, specifically criticizing the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) and advocating for its repeal. She supports maintaining protections for preexisting conditions while promoting short-term health insurance plans that may not cover such protections.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Hyde-Smith opposes expanding ballot access, particularly criticizing the For the People Act, which she claims would nullify voter identification laws in Mississippi. She supports requiring voter ID before voting.
Hyde-Smith opposes expanding ballot access, particularly criticizing the For the People Act, which she claims would nullify voter identification laws in Mississippi. She supports requiring voter ID before voting.
“Require voter ID before voting.”
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Foreign Aid, Climate, Taxes, Education, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Stands behind her 100% pro-life record on abortion issues.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion by seeking to restrict federal funding for abortion services.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Right to bear arms is essential to American Liberty.”
Why: Sponsoring the Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for the protection of gun owners' rights.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S292)
“Stands behind her 100% pro-life record on abortion issues.”
Why: Sponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion by promoting measures that align with pro-life principles.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Stands behind her 100% pro-life record on abortion issues.”
Why: Sponsoring the Protecting Life and Integrity in Research Act directly aligns with the stated opposition to abortion by promoting restrictions on abortion-related funding and services.
View source →Jan 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S302-303)
“Stands behind her 100% pro-life record on abortion issues.”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution honoring a state law that restricts abortion access directly supports the stated opposition to abortion.
View source →Jan 26, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Stands behind her 100% pro-life record on abortion issues.”
Why: Sponsoring the SAVE Moms and Babies Act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion by promoting policies that restrict access to abortion services.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Right to bear arms is essential to American Liberty.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to enhance penalties for firearm theft aligns with the support for gun rights by promoting responsible ownership and security of firearms.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“No to DACA, breaking immigration laws has consequences.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to establish E-Verify aligns with the stated opposition to DACA and supports strict enforcement of immigration laws.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act, which aims to address insulin costs, moves against the stated opposition to a larger government role in health coverage, as it implies federal involvement in healthcare pricing.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2175)
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The action raises awareness about maternal mental health, which can be seen as supportive of healthcare, but does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it focuses on pharmacy access rather than broader healthcare reform.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The action to cosponsor the Save Struggling Hospitals Act does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it may involve support for healthcare funding, but the specific details of the bill are unclear.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The cosponsorship of the Rural Health Innovation Act does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the act may include provisions that could support healthcare access, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The action does not directly address healthcare policy and its implications for the Affordable Care Act, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The sponsorship of BO's Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the specifics of the bill are not provided, leaving the relationship ambiguous.
View source →Oct 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The action to sponsor the Restoring Rural Health Act is ambiguous as it may aim to improve healthcare access in rural areas, but does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act.
Jun 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The IDeA Reauthorization Act focuses on health care access but does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the stated position.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The RESTORE Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act or supports healthcare expansion.
View source →May 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The act aims to improve maternal and infant health, which could align with healthcare goals, but it does not directly address the opposition to the Affordable Care Act or the broader healthcare system.
View source →May 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Rural Health Sustainability Act suggests a focus on healthcare issues, but does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in the relationship.
View source →May 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Save Healthcare Workers Act does not clearly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the act's specific provisions and intent are unclear from the information provided.
View source →Feb 20, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The action relates to health policy but does not directly align with or contradict the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Feb 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Rural Health Focus Act does not clearly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as the act's specific provisions and impacts on healthcare access are unclear.
View source →Aug 1, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The IDeA Reauthorization Act focuses on health care access but does not directly align with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the stated position.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The RESTORE Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, leading to a mixed assessment.
View source →Apr 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The sponsorship of the Rural Health Sustainability Act does not directly align with the stated opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it may involve support for rural health initiatives without clear alignment on broader healthcare reform.
View source →Jun 21, 2023 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Repeal ObamaCare; common-sense healthcare instead.”
Why: The SERVE Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with the opposition to the Affordable Care Act, as it could potentially include elements both for and against her stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2702)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S3011-3012)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 5, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 22, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 12, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2313; text: CR S2310)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S7964)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S1093-1094)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 141.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S716; text: CR S710)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6798; text: CR S6794)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S4856; text: CR S4830)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 125.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 216.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6467; text: CR S6459)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 13, 2024 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S6989; text: 6/13/2024 CR S4088)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Nov 7, 2023 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 597.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.