Sponsorship· Foreign PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Murphy has argued for maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly as it relates to stabilizing regions and reducing migration pressures. He believes that foreign assistance can help improve conditions in other countries.
Murphy has argued for maintaining and expanding U.S. foreign aid, particularly as it relates to stabilizing regions and reducing migration pressures. He believes that foreign assistance can help improve conditions in other countries.
Murphy supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for policies that protect immigrants and refugees while opposing harsh enforcement measures.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Murphy supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for policies that protect immigrants and refugees while opposing harsh enforcement measures.
Chris Murphy supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for policies that address economic inequality and promote job creation.
Chris Murphy supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for policies that address economic inequality and promote job creation.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Chris Murphy is pro-choice and has expressed strong opposition to restrictions on abortion access. He called the overturning of Roe v. Wade a "disaster" and advocates for legal access to abortion without restrictions.
Chris Murphy is pro-choice and has expressed strong opposition to restrictions on abortion access. He called the overturning of Roe v. Wade a "disaster" and advocates for legal access to abortion without restrictions.
Murphy advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has expressed support for policies that promote renewable energy and environmental protection. He has criticized the influence of oil and gas companies on energy policy.
Murphy advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has expressed support for policies that promote renewable energy and environmental protection. He has criticized the influence of oil and gas companies on energy policy.
Murphy is a leading advocate for stricter gun control measures, including a national assault weapons ban and universal background checks. He has criticized the NRA and has been vocal about the need for comprehensive gun violence prevention legislation.
Murphy is a leading advocate for stricter gun control measures, including a national assault weapons ban and universal background checks. He has criticized the NRA and has been vocal about the need for comprehensive gun violence prevention legislation.
Murphy supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the Affordable Care Act and opposing efforts to repeal it. He has called for the establishment of a public insurance option to expand healthcare access.
Murphy supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for the Affordable Care Act and opposing efforts to repeal it. He has called for the establishment of a public insurance option to expand healthcare access.
Murphy supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a minimum tax rate of 30% for those earning over $1 million. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Murphy supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a minimum tax rate of 30% for those earning over $1 million. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy.
Murphy supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for strengthening the public education system rather than promoting school choice through vouchers.
Murphy supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for strengthening the public education system rather than promoting school choice through vouchers.
Murphy advocates for expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, including proposals for automatic voter registration and election day as a holiday.
Murphy advocates for expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, including proposals for automatic voter registration and election day as a holiday.
Murphy supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including advocating for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Murphy supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including advocating for the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) to prohibit employment discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Chris Murphy advocates for government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in addressing crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Chris Murphy advocates for government authority to mandate vaccines and public health measures, emphasizing the importance of public health in addressing crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Vaccines are safe. A Worrisome Portion Of Our Generic Drugs Are Not.”
Chris Murphy supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has expressed a pro-reform stance on drug policy, advocating for depoliticizing medical marijuana.
Chris Murphy supports the legalization of marijuana at the federal level and has expressed a pro-reform stance on drug policy, advocating for depoliticizing medical marijuana.
“Rated B by NORML: depoliticize medical marijuana. (Aug 2024)”
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: National Security, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the stated position of emphasizing diplomatic engagement and reevaluating military actions.
Aug 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S4271-4272)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that honors independence and promotes U.S. relationships with Central Asian countries directly aligns with the emphasis on diplomatic engagement and international cooperation.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The bill aims to prevent domestic abusers from accessing firearms, directly advancing the stated position of supporting stricter gun control measures.
View source →Jul 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 216. (consideration: CR S4357)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the stated position of promoting diplomatic engagement and reevaluating military actions.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the emphasis on diplomatic engagement and reevaluation of military actions.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that promotes the safety and well-being of refugees aligns directly with the emphasis on diplomatic engagement and international cooperation in foreign policy.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Freedom to Travel for Health Care Act directly supports legal access to abortion by ensuring individuals can travel for reproductive health services, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Maternal Health Pandemic Response Act directly supports healthcare access and improvement, aligning with the commitment to the Affordable Care Act and its positive effects.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 118. (consideration: CR S2250-2255)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the stated position of promoting diplomatic engagement and reevaluating military actions.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the emphasis on diplomatic engagement and reevaluation of military actions.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 192. (CR S3194)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the stated position of emphasizing diplomatic engagement and reevaluating military actions.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter registration and access, aligning closely with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act directly supports the stated position of strengthening public education and opposing funding diversion to school choice initiatives.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (text: CR S1583)
Why: Cosponsoring the Plastic Pellet Free Waters Act directly supports stronger environmental regulations and reducing pollution, aligning closely with the stated commitment to climate change policies.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 69.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the stated position of promoting diplomatic engagement and reevaluating military actions.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Sponsoring a resolution to direct the removal of U.S. Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities aligns directly with the stated position of emphasizing diplomatic engagement and reevaluating military actions.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring the West Bank Violence Prevention Act directly supports the stated position on foreign aid by promoting assistance aimed at improving conditions in the region.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill aims to improve access to health professions for low-income individuals, which aligns with the broader goals of supporting healthcare access and the ACA.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to IVF Act supports expanding access to reproductive health services, which aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Vaccines are safe. A Worrisome Portion Of Our Generic Drugs Are Not.”
Why: The EBOLA Act aims to enhance public health measures in response to health crises, which aligns with the support for government authority to mandate public health initiatives.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The act aims to enhance mental health services, which aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and support, consistent with the stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The Gun Records Restoration and Preservation Act supports the overall goal of stricter gun control by enhancing the management of gun records, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the Safe Step Act, which aims to improve access to healthcare, aligns with the support for the Affordable Care Act and the broader goal of maintaining health insurance coverage.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Moms Matter Act aims to improve maternal health care, which aligns with supporting the Affordable Care Act and expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the PHS ACCESS Act indicates support for expanding healthcare access, which aligns with the advocacy for the Affordable Care Act and a public option.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Educational Equity Challenge Grant Act aligns with the support for strengthening public education and increasing funding for K-12 education.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act supports healthcare access and aligns with the advocacy for the Affordable Care Act, although it does not directly address the public option.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Cosponsoring the Health Care Fairness for Military Families Act supports healthcare access for military families, aligning with the broader commitment to healthcare support, though it does not directly address the public option or ACA opposition.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Data to Save Moms Act supports healthcare improvements, aligning with the advocacy for the Affordable Care Act and the public option, even though the specific details of the act are not provided.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to federal student loans moves against the support for measures to reduce student debt, contradicting the stated position.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action addresses military involvement rather than foreign aid, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action addresses military involvement rather than foreign aid, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 46 - 51. Record Vote Number: 88. (consideration: CR S1889-1890)
Why: The action relates to military engagement rather than direct foreign aid, creating ambiguity about its alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 113. (consideration: CR S2156-2158)
Why: The action relates to military engagement rather than direct foreign aid, creating ambiguity about its alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action addresses military involvement rather than foreign aid, creating uncertainty about its alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The action addresses food security, which is related to healthcare access, but does not directly advance the stated support for the Affordable Care Act or a public option.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided information, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on healthcare.
Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 79.
Why: The action to cosponsor a resolution for military withdrawal from Iran does not directly align with the support for foreign aid, as it focuses on military engagement rather than assistance, creating ambiguity in the relationship.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action addresses military involvement rather than foreign aid directly, creating ambiguity about its alignment with the stated support for foreign assistance.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Tagged to National Security, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2418-2419)
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Tagged to Civil Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 439.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Voting Rights, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on $900 billion COVID relief package. (Dec 2020)”
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1523; text: CR S1517)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.