Sponsorship· Voting RightsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Boyle supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has voted to increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps, indicating a favorable stance towards immigration reform.
Boyle supports expanding legal immigration pathways and has voted to increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps, indicating a favorable stance towards immigration reform.
“Increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps. (Apr 2019)”
Brendan Boyle supports legal access to abortion and has expressed a commitment to ensuring safe and legal abortion without restrictions. He has stated that funding abortion is essential to avoid discrimination against poor women.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Brendan Boyle supports legal access to abortion and has expressed a commitment to ensuring safe and legal abortion without restrictions. He has stated that funding abortion is essential to avoid discrimination against poor women.
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions. (Sep 2018)”
Boyle supports federal action to cut emissions and has been involved in promoting environmental policies, including a commitment to achieving 50% clean and carbon-free electricity by 2030 and endorsing the Green New Deal.
Boyle supports federal action to cut emissions and has been involved in promoting environmental policies, including a commitment to achieving 50% clean and carbon-free electricity by 2030 and endorsing the Green New Deal.
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Boyle supports requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. However, he has also been noted for opposing restrictions on gun ownership.
Boyle supports requiring background checks for every firearm sale and transfer. However, he has also been noted for opposing restrictions on gun ownership.
“Require background check for every firearm sale and transfer. (Jan 2019)”
Boyle supports the creation of a public option for health insurance and opposes efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). He has criticized claims that the ACA is a disaster.
Boyle supports the creation of a public option for health insurance and opposes efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). He has criticized claims that the ACA is a disaster.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Brendan Boyle supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a tax system where billionaires pay higher rates than workers.
Brendan Boyle supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for a tax system where billionaires pay higher rates than workers.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Brendan Boyle advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has emphasized the importance of investing in education to ensure that public schools are among the best in the world.
Brendan Boyle advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has emphasized the importance of investing in education to ensure that public schools are among the best in the world.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Boyle is in favor of expanding ballot access, supporting measures such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns.
Boyle is in favor of expanding ballot access, supporting measures such as automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation.
May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on the Judiciary, House Administration, the Budget, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, Ways and Means, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Why: The Protecting Our Democracy Act includes provisions for automatic voter registration and aims to enhance voting access, directly advancing the stated position on voting rights.
Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act directly supports the position of increasing taxes on the wealthy to promote economic equity.
View source →Apr 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the Tax Fairness for Workers Act directly supports the position of increasing tax rates for billionaires and promoting economic equity.
View source →Apr 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the Paying a Fair Share Act directly aligns with the stated position of advocating for higher tax rates on billionaires and increasing the estate tax.
View source →Jul 27, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the Tax Fairness for Workers Act directly supports the position of increasing tax rates for billionaires and promoting economic equity.
View source →May 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the American High-Speed Rail Act supports clean transportation initiatives, which aligns with the broader climate change goals of reducing emissions and promoting sustainable energy.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to expand mental health services in schools supports the overall goal of enhancing public education, aligning with the advocacy for increased funding and resources.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Increasing Behavioral Health Treatment Act supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on healthcare reform.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Mental Health Inpatient Equity Act supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access and equity, aligning with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action aims to improve drug pricing, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access and affordability, though it does not directly address the public option or ACA protections.
View source →Apr 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: The action supports funding for essential community services, including libraries, which aligns with the advocacy for increased funding for public education.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Why: The Emergency Conservation Program Improvement Act is relevant to climate policy and supports conservation efforts, aligning with the stated commitment to aggressive climate change policies.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Pride In Mental Health Act supports mental health initiatives, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access, though it does not directly address the public option or ACA repeal.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: Cosponsoring the anti-harassment act supports the broader goal of improving public education environments, aligning with the advocacy for increased funding and support for public education.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines, and Hazardous Materials.
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Why: Cosponsoring the act indicates support for regulating pipelines, which aligns with the broader climate change policies aimed at reducing environmental harm.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Momnibus Act, which aims to improve maternal health care access and outcomes, aligns with the support for expanding healthcare options and protecting the ACA.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Why: The Homeowner Energy Freedom Act relates to energy policy and supports clean energy initiatives, aligning with the stated commitment to aggressive climate change policies.
View source →May 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring the Medicare and Social Security Fair Share Act supports the broader goal of expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Apr 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on mental and physical health care aligns with the support for expanding healthcare access, although it does not directly address the public option or the ACA.
View source →Nov 21, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring legislation aimed at early detection and survival of lung cancer aligns with the broader goal of improving healthcare access and outcomes, supporting the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Dec 14, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: Sponsoring the PSLF Administrative Improvements Act supports the broader goal of improving access to education, aligning with the advocacy for increased funding and support for public education.
View source →Nov 17, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill addressing mental and physical health care aligns with the support for expanding healthcare access, though it does not directly create a public option.
View source →May 17, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Environment and Climate Change.
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Why: Sponsoring the Protect Drinking Water from PFAS Act relates to environmental protection and aligns with broader climate goals, even though it does not directly address carbon emissions.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to suspend fuel excise taxes contradicts the stated support for higher taxes on billionaires and economic equity, as it reduces tax revenue during a time of high gasoline prices.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“Increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps. (Apr 2019)”
Why: Voting against the appropriations act, which likely includes funding for immigration services, contradicts the support for legalizing DREAMers and increasing visa caps.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030. (Mar 2016)”
Why: Voting Nay on a bill aimed at promoting energy freedom contradicts the stated commitment to aggressive climate change policies and clean energy goals.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
“Increase both high-skill and family-based visa caps. (Apr 2019)”
Why: The appropriations act may include various immigration-related provisions, but without specific details on its impact on legalizing DREAMers or increasing visa caps, the alignment with the stated position is unclear.
View source →May 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a transparency bill does not directly address tax rates or increases, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action focuses on H-1B visas for healthcare workers, which does not directly advance or oppose the stated support for a public option or the ACA, leading to unclear alignment with the healthcare position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 44 - 0.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a reimbursement stability act does not directly advance the stated support for a public option or opposition to ACA repeal, leaving its alignment with the healthcare position unclear.
View source →May 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: While the action promotes appreciation for teachers, it does not directly address funding for public education or opposition to voucher programs, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action of cosponsoring the Small Business Investor Tax Parity Act does not clearly align with the stated position on higher taxes for billionaires and economic equity, as the specifics of the bill are not detailed in the summary.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The FULL HOUSE Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated support for higher taxes on billionaires and estate tax increases.
Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 37 - 3.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The act focuses on patient access to breakthrough products, which may align with healthcare access goals but does not directly address the public option or ACA protections.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The CREATE Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with the support for higher taxes on billionaires and estate tax increases.
View source →Mar 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: While the act is referred to the education committee, it primarily focuses on wages for home care workers rather than directly addressing public education funding or school voucher programs.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action pertains to Medicaid and SNAP, which are related to healthcare access, but the specific provisions and intent of the bill are unclear, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated support for a public option and opposition to ACA repeal.
View source →Mar 25, 2025 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 380.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The act focuses on lung cancer research and preventive services, which aligns with healthcare support but does not directly advance the specific position on public insurance options or the ACA.
View source →Aug 4, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
“Automatic voter registration for all citizens. (Mar 2015)”
Why: The action does not directly address voting rights or access but relates to transparency in the judicial process regarding election integrity, which has indirect implications for voting rights.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The act focuses on lung cancer research and prevention, which is healthcare-related but does not directly advance the stated support for a public option or opposition to ACA repeal.
View source →Jul 11, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Social Security.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action focuses on Medicare and Social Security, which relates to healthcare but does not directly advance the stated support for a public option or opposition to ACA repeal.
View source →Jun 30, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action does not directly address tax rates or equity, leaving its alignment with the stated position unclear.
View source →Oct 27, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action relates to healthcare by addressing qualified medical expenses, but it does not directly advance the stated support for a public option or opposition to ACA repeal.
View source →Sep 29, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action's specifics are unclear, as it is not evident how the Debt Ceiling Reform Act aligns with or contradicts the stated support for higher taxes on billionaires and estate tax increases.
View source →Sep 3, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“Billionaires should pay higher tax rates than workers. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The action involves tax reform related to higher education endowments, which does not directly align with the stated position on taxing billionaires or raising the estate tax, creating ambiguity in its alignment.
View source →Jun 8, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The sponsorship of a lung cancer detection act does not directly address the creation of a public option or opposition to ACA repeal, making the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 26, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
“More funding for schools, teachers, and colleges. (Nov 2004)”
Why: The action to sponsor a bill aimed at not taxing higher education does not directly align with increased public education funding or opposition to vouchers, creating ambiguity in its relationship to the stated position.
View source →Apr 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The MIND Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to assess its alignment with the support for a public option and opposition to ACA repeal.
View source →Mar 16, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.
“Push to create a public option for insurance. (Oct 2014)”
Why: The AARF Act's specifics are unclear, and while sponsorship suggests support for healthcare initiatives, it does not directly advance the stated position on a public option or opposition to ACA repeal.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
Yea-and-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Failed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov (House roll-call)
2/3 Yea-And-Nay — Result: Passed
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 25, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 14, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Livestock and Foreign Agriculture.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Financial Services, Ways and Means, the Judiciary, Education and Workforce, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Budget, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, Transportation and Infrastructure, Rules, Foreign Affairs, the Judiciary, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Rules, and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 30, 2024 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 18, 2024 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 118-89.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 6, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Work and Welfare.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2023 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 9, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 15, 2022 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Rules, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 22, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 19, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 1, 2021 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Subcommittee on Worker and Family Support.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.