Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Hagerty opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities, advocating for stricter border security measures. His position reflects a strong opposition to expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
Hagerty opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities, advocating for stricter border security measures. His position reflects a strong opposition to expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
“Opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities.”
Hagerty vehemently opposes taxpayer funding for abortion and supports possible exceptions only in cases of rape or incest. He is also anti-Planned Parenthood, indicating a strong opposition to legal access to abortion.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Hagerty vehemently opposes taxpayer funding for abortion and supports possible exceptions only in cases of rape or incest. He is also anti-Planned Parenthood, indicating a strong opposition to legal access to abortion.
“Vehemently opposes taxpayer funds for abortion. Possible exceptions for rape/incest, "challenging" situation.”
Hagerty believes the threat to gun rights is real and strongly supports the absolute right to gun ownership. He opposes any limitations on gun rights, indicating a strong stance against stricter firearms regulation.
Hagerty believes the threat to gun rights is real and strongly supports the absolute right to gun ownership. He opposes any limitations on gun rights, indicating a strong stance against stricter firearms regulation.
“The threat to gun rights is real.”
Hagerty opposes the Affordable Care Act and advocates for reducing government involvement in healthcare, promoting a return to patient choice in a free market system.
Hagerty opposes the Affordable Care Act and advocates for reducing government involvement in healthcare, promoting a return to patient choice in a free market system.
“Return health care to patient choice in free market.”
Hagerty supports reducing taxes and cutting spending, opposing any tax increases on corporations and top earners. He is committed to a balanced budget amendment and believes in maintaining lower taxes.
Hagerty supports reducing taxes and cutting spending, opposing any tax increases on corporations and top earners. He is committed to a balanced budget amendment and believes in maintaining lower taxes.
“Stop the socialist agenda; cut corporate tax rate.”
Hagerty supports measures to protect the Constitution and has expressed opposition to efforts that he perceives as undermining election integrity.
Hagerty supports measures to protect the Constitution and has expressed opposition to efforts that he perceives as undermining election integrity.
“Protect Constitution; support Congressional term limits.”
Hagerty supports free trade agreements and is critical of policies that increase dependency on foreign nations like China. He advocates for a strong stance against tariffs that raise prices for consumers.
Hagerty supports free trade agreements and is critical of policies that increase dependency on foreign nations like China. He advocates for a strong stance against tariffs that raise prices for consumers.
“Stand with Trump on being firm with China.”
Hagerty supports the death penalty for individuals convicted of human trafficking, emphasizing a strong stance on law enforcement and upholding the rule of law.
Hagerty supports the death penalty for individuals convicted of human trafficking, emphasizing a strong stance on law enforcement and upholding the rule of law.
“Supports death penalty for human trafficking.”
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, Climate, Education, School Curriculum, Tech Regulation.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Vehemently opposes taxpayer funds for abortion. Possible exceptions for rape/incest, "challenging" situation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports the stated opposition to taxpayer funding for abortion and aligns with the figure's anti-Planned Parenthood stance.
Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“The threat to gun rights is real.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Gun Owner Registration Information Protection Act directly supports the stated position by protecting gun ownership rights.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S292)
“Vehemently opposes taxpayer funds for abortion. Possible exceptions for rape/incest, "challenging" situation.”
Why: The SAVE Moms and Babies Act aims to restrict taxpayer funding for abortion, aligning directly with the stated opposition to abortion funding.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities.”
Why: Cosponsoring the ICE Protection Act directly supports strict border security measures, aligning closely with the stated opposition to amnesty and sanctuary cities.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Vehemently opposes taxpayer funds for abortion. Possible exceptions for rape/incest, "challenging" situation.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Life at Conception Act directly aligns with the stated opposition to abortion by seeking to establish legal personhood from conception.
View source →Jun 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that targets funding for sanctuary cities directly supports the stated opposition to such policies and aligns with advocating for strict border security measures.
View source →Dec 16, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill to support the border wall directly advances the stated opposition to amnesty and sanctuary cities by reinforcing strict border security measures.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“The threat to gun rights is real.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that enhances penalties for firearm theft aligns with the stated support for gun rights by reinforcing the legal framework protecting gun ownership.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“Stand with Trump on being firm with China.”
Why: Cosponsoring the IGO Anti-Boycott Act aligns with the position of supporting fair trade practices and reducing dependency on unfair trade practices, particularly concerning China.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill aimed at preventing illegal aliens from driving under the influence aligns with the stated opposition to amnesty and supports strict border security measures.
View source →Nov 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“Protect Constitution; support Congressional term limits.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at preventing foreign interference in elections aligns with the stated position of supporting election integrity, even if it does not directly address domestic voting rights issues.
View source →Apr 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Opposes amnesty, DACA, and sanctuary cities.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill focused on immigration compliance aligns with the stated opposition to amnesty and support for strict border security measures.
View source →Jun 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
“Protect Constitution; support Congressional term limits.”
Why: Sponsoring the Equal Representation Act, which aims to expand voting rights, directly contradicts the stated opposition to measures perceived as undermining election integrity.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Return health care to patient choice in free market.”
Why: The action to cosponsor a bill aimed at supporting hospitals does not directly align with the stated opposition to government involvement in healthcare, creating ambiguity about the overall intent.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Stand with Trump on being firm with China.”
Why: The action relates to trade policy but does not directly advance or contradict the stated position on supporting the USMCA or addressing unfair trade practices.
View source →Feb 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Return health care to patient choice in free market.”
Why: The Payment Integrity Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated opposition to government involvement in healthcare.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 404.
“Supports death penalty for human trafficking.”
Why: The cosponsorship of the Federal Carjacking Enforcement Act does not directly address the death penalty for human trafficking, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jan 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports death penalty for human trafficking.”
Why: The Fraud Accountability Act may relate to law enforcement but does not directly address the death penalty or human trafficking, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports death penalty for human trafficking.”
Why: The Back the Blue Act focuses on law enforcement support, which aligns with a strong law enforcement stance, but does not directly address the death penalty or human trafficking specifically.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Return health care to patient choice in free market.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a veterans' healthcare bill does not clearly align with the opposition to government involvement in healthcare, as it may imply support for federal healthcare provisions for veterans.
Jul 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports death penalty for human trafficking.”
Why: The action focuses on DUI prevention and community safety, which relates to law enforcement but does not directly address the death penalty or human trafficking, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Apr 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports death penalty for human trafficking.”
Why: The act focuses on de-escalation in law enforcement, which may align with some criminal justice reform goals but does not directly support the stated position on the death penalty for human trafficking.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Return health care to patient choice in free market.”
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S347)
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 23, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1357; text: CR S1381-1382)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S716; text: CR S710)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 301.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S263; text: CR S261)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8533; text: CR S8532)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 2, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Became Public Law No: 119-27.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 33.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2024 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.