Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Sanders supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He advocates for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
Sanders supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He advocates for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
Bernie Sanders is pro-choice and advocates for legal access to abortion. He has a lifetime pro-choice record and supports funding for family planning and contraceptive services, emphasizing that women have the right to choose regardless of income.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Bernie Sanders is pro-choice and advocates for legal access to abortion. He has a lifetime pro-choice record and supports funding for family planning and contraceptive services, emphasizing that women have the right to choose regardless of income.
Sanders views climate change as a serious threat and advocates for substantial federal action to cut emissions. He supports the Green New Deal and has called for significant investments in infrastructure to promote sustainability and job creation.
Sanders views climate change as a serious threat and advocates for substantial federal action to cut emissions. He supports the Green New Deal and has called for significant investments in infrastructure to promote sustainability and job creation.
Sanders supports stricter firearms regulation, including universal background checks and closing the gun show loophole. He has advocated for banning assault weapons and increasing funding for research on gun violence.
Sanders supports stricter firearms regulation, including universal background checks and closing the gun show loophole. He has advocated for banning assault weapons and increasing funding for research on gun violence.
Sanders advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting universal, single-payer healthcare. He has criticized the Affordable Care Act for not going far enough and emphasizes the need for comprehensive healthcare reform.
Sanders advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting universal, single-payer healthcare. He has criticized the Affordable Care Act for not going far enough and emphasizes the need for comprehensive healthcare reform.
Sanders supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners to fund social programs and reduce income inequality. He advocates for a progressive tax system that ensures the wealthy pay their fair share.
Sanders supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners to fund social programs and reduce income inequality. He advocates for a progressive tax system that ensures the wealthy pay their fair share.
Sanders advocates for more federal funding for public schools and supports making public colleges and universities tuition-free. He believes in canceling student debt and investing in early childhood education.
Sanders advocates for more federal funding for public schools and supports making public colleges and universities tuition-free. He believes in canceling student debt and investing in early childhood education.
Sanders advocates for expanding ballot access and supports measures to protect voting rights, including automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that disenfranchise voters.
Sanders advocates for expanding ballot access and supports measures to protect voting rights, including automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that disenfranchise voters.
Sanders supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and advocates for criminal justice reform to address issues like mass incarceration and police brutality. He has called for the abolition of private prisons and the death penalty.
Sanders supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and advocates for criminal justice reform to address issues like mass incarceration and police brutality. He has called for the abolition of private prisons and the death penalty.
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly supports the stated position on legal access to abortion.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Cosponsoring the Federal Death Penalty Prohibition Act directly advances the stated position by advocating for the abolition of the death penalty.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position by advocating for increased access to abortion services and reproductive rights.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports humane treatment of immigrants and addresses family separation, aligning closely with the stated position on immigration reform.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2055)
Why: Cosponsoring a constitutional amendment to protect the fundamental right to vote directly advances the stated position of expanding voting rights and combating voter suppression.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voting rights and making voting more accessible.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Ending the Carried Interest Loophole Act directly supports the stated position by targeting tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy, aligning with the goal of progressive taxation.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Keep Public Funds in Public Schools Act directly supports the stated position of investing in education and promoting equality by ensuring public funding remains in public schools.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Equal Tax Act aligns directly with the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on the wealthy and corporations to address income inequality.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for higher taxes on corporations to address income inequality.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The bill focuses on natural climate solutions and research, which aligns with the broader goal of cutting emissions and promoting sustainability, though it may not represent the substantial federal action called for in the stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Strength in Diversity Act aims to promote equitable educational opportunities, which aligns with the broader commitment to investing in education and supporting equality.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Sponsoring the Universal School Meals Program Act supports educational equity by ensuring access to nutrition for students, aligning with the broader goal of promoting equality in education.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The act aims to expand community schools, which aligns with investing in education and promoting equality, though it does not directly address tuition-free college or student debt cancellation.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that supports enhanced oil recovery contradicts the stated commitment to bold climate action and investment in renewable energy.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action involves disapproving regulations related to student loans, which could have both positive and negative implications for student debt and education access, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: The action focuses on veterans' benefits and does not directly address the stated goals of criminal justice reform, leading to unclear alignment with the position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The SAFE for Survivors Act focuses on specific healthcare provisions but does not directly advance the broader goal of universal, single-payer healthcare.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action involves disapproving a Medicare-related rule, which could be seen as an attempt to influence Medicare policy, but it does not directly advance the goal of universal, single-payer healthcare.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action focuses on labor rights related to overtime pay, which does not directly align with the stated healthcare position, creating ambiguity in its relevance to healthcare advocacy.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to labor and education, but it does not directly address tuition-free college or student debt cancellation, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: The action focuses on climate change education, which is related to education but does not directly advance the stated position on tuition-free public colleges or student debt cancellation.
Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Drug Deal Disclosure Act relates to healthcare transparency but does not directly advance the goal of universal, single-payer healthcare, leading to ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The action addresses a specific aspect of healthcare related to nutrition but does not directly advance the broader goal of universal, single-payer healthcare.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: The action involves disapproving a rule related to federal student loans, which could be seen as both a step against student debt relief and a procedural move rather than a direct advancement of the stated position on education.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: The action cosponsoring a bill focused on military families does not directly advance the universal, single-payer healthcare goal, but it does relate to healthcare access, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Guardianship Bill of Rights Act does not directly address universal healthcare or single-payer systems, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: While the act supports home care workers, it does not directly advance the goal of universal, single-payer healthcare, leaving the relationship between the action and the stated position unclear.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
The motion to discharge fell when the point of order was well taken.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S1786)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1049)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 36 - 63. Record Vote Number: 81. (consideration: CR S1779)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 371.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S1380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1058)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.