Sponsorship· ClimateSponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Angus King has criticized restrictive immigration policies and supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has opposed measures that would separate immigrant families and has advocated for humane treatment of asylum seekers.
Angus King has criticized restrictive immigration policies and supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has opposed measures that would separate immigrant families and has advocated for humane treatment of asylum seekers.
“King strongly criticized President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769...”
“Sponsored bill to disallow religion-based immigration ban.”
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Angus King emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while advocating for diplomatic engagement. He has supported measures to ensure U.S. security without resorting to military force unless necessary.
Angus King emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while advocating for diplomatic engagement. He has supported measures to ensure U.S. security without resorting to military force unless necessary.
“No military force against Iran without Congress approval.”
Angus King supports legal access to abortion and has expressed opposition to defunding Planned Parenthood. He believes that overturning Roe v. Wade would rob millions of women of their fundamental rights and advocates for access to safe, legal abortion without restrictions.
Angus King supports legal access to abortion and has expressed opposition to defunding Planned Parenthood. He believes that overturning Roe v. Wade would rob millions of women of their fundamental rights and advocates for access to safe, legal abortion without restrictions.
“Favors abortion rights; keep Planned Parenthood funding.”
“Access safe, legal abortion without restrictions.”
Angus King advocates for federal action to cut emissions and combat climate change. He has called climate change one of the most serious threats to the United States and supports initiatives like the Paris Climate Accord.
Angus King advocates for federal action to cut emissions and combat climate change. He has called climate change one of the most serious threats to the United States and supports initiatives like the Paris Climate Accord.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
“50% clean and carbon free electricity by 2030.”
Angus King supports expanding background checks for firearms transactions and has called this measure the most effective step to keep guns out of the wrong hands. He also supports limiting magazine sizes and has voted for various gun reform measures, including the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.
Angus King supports expanding background checks for firearms transactions and has called this measure the most effective step to keep guns out of the wrong hands. He also supports limiting magazine sizes and has voted for various gun reform measures, including the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act.
“King supports expanding background checks to most firearms transactions...”
“Implement red flag laws; expand background checks.”
Angus King supports the Affordable Care Act and has expressed the need for a larger government role in health coverage. He has criticized efforts to repeal the ACA and has advocated for maintaining and expanding healthcare access, particularly for vulnerable populations.
Angus King supports the Affordable Care Act and has expressed the need for a larger government role in health coverage. He has criticized efforts to repeal the ACA and has advocated for maintaining and expanding healthcare access, particularly for vulnerable populations.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
“ObamaCare was not ambitious enough.”
Angus King supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that taming the deficit without revenue increases is unrealistic. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy and has advocated for closing corporate tax loopholes.
Angus King supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, arguing that taming the deficit without revenue increases is unrealistic. He has criticized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit the wealthy and has advocated for closing corporate tax loopholes.
“King criticized the legislation for adding $1 trillion to the U.S. budget deficit...”
“Close corporate tax loopholes: 15% corporate tax minimum.”
Angus King supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to make voting easier, including automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns. He has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter access.
Angus King supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to make voting easier, including automatic voter registration and public financing of federal campaigns. He has sponsored legislation aimed at improving voter access.
“King has sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access.”
“Sponsored bill for election holiday & easier voting access.”
Angus King supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for policies that promote trade while protecting American jobs. He has expressed concerns about unfair trade practices, particularly with China.
Angus King supports free-trade agreements and lower tariffs, advocating for policies that promote trade while protecting American jobs. He has expressed concerns about unfair trade practices, particularly with China.
“Implement USMCA for improved North American trade.”
Angus King supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including for LGBTQ individuals. He has endorsed principles embodied in the Equal Rights Amendment and has a history of advocating for equal rights and protections for all individuals.
Angus King supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including for LGBTQ individuals. He has endorsed principles embodied in the Equal Rights Amendment and has a history of advocating for equal rights and protections for all individuals.
“Supports gay marriage.”
“Support principles embodied in the Equal Rights Amendment.”
King supports government authority to mandate public health measures, including vaccinations, as a means to protect public health. He has emphasized the importance of addressing health crises through coordinated federal responses.
King supports government authority to mandate public health measures, including vaccinations, as a means to protect public health. He has emphasized the importance of addressing health crises through coordinated federal responses.
“Resources to LGBTQ youth for mental health/ prevent suicide.”
Position extraction pending on 10 issues: Foreign Policy, Economy & Jobs, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Drug & Addiction Policy, Religion & Public Life, Disaster Response.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
Why: Sponsoring a bill that facilitates offshore wind energy development directly advances the stated position of supporting federal action to cut emissions and promote clean energy.
Jul 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Sponsoring the CARE for Mental Health Professionals Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare services, aligning with the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“King has sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access.”
Why: Cosponsoring the SHIELD Our Elections Act directly supports measures to protect voter access and participation, aligning closely with the stated position on expanding ballot access.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“King has sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to Vote Act directly advances the stated position of expanding ballot access and increasing voter participation.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
“Supports gay marriage.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month directly supports the advocacy for stronger federal protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“King strongly criticized President Donald Trump's Executive Order 13769...”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that designates Haiti for temporary protected status directly supports expanding legal immigration and humane treatment of immigrants, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
“Supports gay marriage.”
Why: The resolution directly acknowledges discrimination against LGBTQ individuals and commits to pursuing equal rights, aligning closely with the stated position on stronger federal protections.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to primary and behavioral health care directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
“King has sponsored bill to expand voter registration and voter access.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter access, aligning closely with the stated position on voting rights.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the bill.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring the Rx ACCESS Act directly supports the goal of making healthcare more accessible and affordable, aligning with the stated position on the ACA and healthcare services.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act directly supports making healthcare more accessible and affordable by addressing insulin costs, aligning closely with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Sponsoring the WELL Seniors Act, which aims to expand healthcare access for seniors, directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Sponsoring the Stand Strong for Medicare Act directly supports expanding government involvement in health coverage, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Sponsoring the Preventive Home Visit Act directly supports expanding access to healthcare services, aligning with the stated position of advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring the Safe Step Act, which aims to improve access to healthcare services, aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring the Right to IVF Act supports expanding access to healthcare services, which aligns with the stated position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
Why: The bill aims to promote wildfire reduction and management, which aligns with the broader goal of reducing emissions and combating climate change.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4196-4197)
“Supports gay marriage.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing the significance of equal pay aligns with the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly in relation to marginalized groups.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
Why: The Small Farm Conservation Act promotes conservation practices that can contribute to reducing emissions, aligning with the stated position on federal action to combat climate change.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring the Ensuring Seniors’ Access to Quality Care Act supports the broader goal of expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2444-2445)
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: The bill aims to improve mental health services and accessibility, which aligns with the broader goal of making healthcare accessible and affordable.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports the broader goal of improving healthcare access for seniors, aligning with the commitment to making healthcare accessible and affordable.
View source →Nov 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at preventive health savings aligns with the position of expanding access to healthcare services, even though the specific content of the bill is not detailed.
View source →Jul 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4829)
“Resources to LGBTQ youth for mental health/ prevent suicide.”
Why: Sponsoring a resolution that recognizes the work of a public health task force supports the broader public health measures and vaccination efforts, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Apr 19, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 118-287.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
Why: Sponsoring the POWER Our Reservoirs Act indicates support for measures that can contribute to climate action, aligning with the stated position on reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 456.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act directly contradicts the stated support for expanding government involvement in health coverage.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
“King supports expanding background checks to most firearms transactions...”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund aimed at preventing weaponization directly contradicts the stated support for stricter gun regulations and background checks.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
Why: The bill's content is unclear in terms of its direct impact on emissions or climate action, making it difficult to assess alignment with the stated position.
View source →Aug 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: The measure's content could not be determined from the provided information, making it unclear how it aligns with the stated position on healthcare.
View source →Jul 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S4270-4271)
“Supports gay marriage.”
Why: The resolution addresses rights related to individuals with disabilities, which is relevant to civil rights but does not directly advance the specific focus on LGBTQ rights and protections.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
“King supports the Affordable Care Act (ACA or Obamacare)...”
Why: The action focuses on veterans' healthcare, which aligns with the broader goal of accessible healthcare, but does not directly address the ACA or the opposition to its repeal.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Resources to LGBTQ youth for mental health/ prevent suicide.”
Why: The measure's content regarding vaccine mandates is unclear, making it difficult to determine its alignment with the stated position on public health.
View source →Oct 17, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 118-311.
“We are fiddling while the planet burns.”
Why: The measure's content is unclear from the provided summary, making it difficult to determine its direct impact on emissions or climate action.
Aug 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 106.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1902; text: CR S1938-1939)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“King criticized the legislation for adding $1 trillion to the U.S. budget deficit...”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S1786)
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Implement USMCA for improved North American trade.”
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 17, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 30, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Disaster Response, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Aug 6, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 543.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S3942-3946; text: CR S3943-3946)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Star Print ordered on the resolution.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 52. Record Vote Number: 215.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 317.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380-2381)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 7, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 18, 2025 · Congress.gov
Failed of passage in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 50. Record Vote Number: 654.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 3, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.