Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Klobuchar supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
Klobuchar supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for comprehensive immigration reform that includes a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants.
“Comprehensive immigration reform is needed. (Jan 2020)”
Amy Klobuchar is pro-choice and supports legal access to abortion. She has advocated for codifying Roe v. Wade into law and opposes criminalizing abortion or imprisoning doctors who provide abortion services.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Amy Klobuchar is pro-choice and supports legal access to abortion. She has advocated for codifying Roe v. Wade into law and opposes criminalizing abortion or imprisoning doctors who provide abortion services.
“Make right to choose the law of the land. (Feb 2020)”
Klobuchar supports federal action to cut emissions and has expressed a commitment to rejoining the Paris climate agreement. She emphasizes the need for investment in climate change solutions that do not harm the economy.
Klobuchar supports federal action to cut emissions and has expressed a commitment to rejoining the Paris climate agreement. She emphasizes the need for investment in climate change solutions that do not harm the economy.
“Rejoin Paris climate deal; meet UN goals. (Feb 2019)”
Klobuchar supports stricter firearms regulation, including universal background checks and banning assault weapons. She believes that commonsense gun laws have widespread public support.
Klobuchar supports stricter firearms regulation, including universal background checks and banning assault weapons. She believes that commonsense gun laws have widespread public support.
“Banning assault weapons will reduce fatalities. (Sep 2019)”
Klobuchar supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a public option and measures to lower drug prices. She opposes Medicare-for-All as it would eliminate existing insurance for many Americans.
Klobuchar supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a public option and measures to lower drug prices. She opposes Medicare-for-All as it would eliminate existing insurance for many Americans.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Klobuchar supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that ensure the wealthy pay their fair share to fund public services and reduce income inequality.
Klobuchar supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax reforms that ensure the wealthy pay their fair share to fund public services and reduce income inequality.
“Rated 50% by the USAE, indicating a mixed record on tax issues. (Dec 2012)”
Klobuchar advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has supported initiatives to make community college free. She emphasizes the importance of investing in education to improve outcomes for students.
Klobuchar advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has supported initiatives to make community college free. She emphasizes the importance of investing in education to improve outcomes for students.
“Make two years of community college free. (Mar 2018)”
Klobuchar supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures such as automatic voter registration and the protection of voting rights against suppression tactics.
Klobuchar supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures such as automatic voter registration and the protection of voting rights against suppression tactics.
“Protect voting rights with early voting, mail-in ballots. (Apr 2020)”
Klobuchar supports reducing criminal penalties for nonviolent drug offenses and has called for reforms to address racial disparities in the criminal justice system. She advocates for treatment over punishment for drug users.
Klobuchar supports reducing criminal penalties for nonviolent drug offenses and has called for reforms to address racial disparities in the criminal justice system. She advocates for treatment over punishment for drug users.
“Reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders. (Sep 2019)”
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: Foreign Aid, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Make right to choose the law of the land. (Feb 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Comprehensive immigration reform is needed. (Jan 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports the stated position by addressing family separation, which aligns with advocating for humane treatment of asylum seekers.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2435; text: CR S2445)
“Rejoin Paris climate deal; meet UN goals. (Feb 2019)”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing Renewable Fuels Month supports the broader goal of promoting renewable energy and reducing carbon impacts, aligning with the stated commitment to address climate change.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: Cosponsoring the SPARC Act, which aims to improve healthcare access and affordability, aligns with the support for a public option and efforts to address drug pricing.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The action focuses on cancer strategy development, which is healthcare-related but does not directly advance the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The Moms Matter Act focuses on maternal health and support, which aligns with healthcare improvements but does not directly advance the stated position for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Comprehensive immigration reform is needed. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The action addresses specific immigration-related issues but does not directly advance comprehensive reform or a pathway to citizenship, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2444-2445)
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The action addresses mental health services, which aligns with healthcare support, but does not directly advance the specific goals of a public option or drug affordability.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The act addresses healthcare access but does not directly advance the specific support for a public option or affordability measures against Big Pharma, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 411.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The act addresses a specific healthcare issue related to PTSD but does not directly advance the broader public option or affordability goals, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S116-117)
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The action relates to healthcare access but does not directly advance the stated support for a public option or address drug affordability, leaving the alignment with the stated position unclear.
May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The ABLE MATCH Act does not directly address healthcare access or affordability, making the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The act focuses on women's health issues, which aligns with healthcare support, but does not directly address the public option or drug affordability concerns.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The BABIES Act focuses on maternal and infant health, which aligns with healthcare support, but does not directly address the public option or drug pricing concerns.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The action addresses healthcare access but does not directly advance the stated support for a public option or affordability measures against Big Pharma, leading to unclear alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The Credit for Caring Act focuses on support for family caregivers, which does not directly advance or contradict the stated position on healthcare, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Non-profit public option: I have a plan for that. (Jan 2020)”
Why: The Essential Caregivers Act addresses healthcare access but does not directly advance the specific support for a public option or affordability measures against Big Pharma, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 50% by the USAE, indicating a mixed record on tax issues. (Dec 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 50% by the USAE, indicating a mixed record on tax issues. (Dec 2012)”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
“Reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders. (Sep 2019)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make two years of community college free. (Mar 2018)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
“Reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders. (Sep 2019)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 410.
“Reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders. (Sep 2019)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 414.
“Reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders. (Sep 2019)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 416.
“Reduce sentences for nonviolent offenders. (Sep 2019)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Make two years of community college free. (Mar 2018)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2701)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 412.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S2131-2132)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2134)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
The motion to discharge fell when the point of order was well taken.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2075)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and an amended preamble by Unanimous Consent. (text: CR S1610)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.