Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Adam Schiff supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for protections for immigrants and reforms to the immigration system.
Adam Schiff supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for protections for immigrants and reforms to the immigration system.
“Voted NO on building a fence along the Mexican border. (Sep 2006)”
Adam Schiff supports legal access to abortion and has a pro-choice voting record. He has voted against measures that would restrict abortion access and has advocated for funding for reproductive health services.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Adam Schiff supports legal access to abortion and has a pro-choice voting record. He has voted against measures that would restrict abortion access and has advocated for funding for reproductive health services.
“Supports right to choose. (Jan 2001)”
Adam Schiff advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various environmental initiatives, including tax incentives for renewable energy and stricter emissions regulations.
Adam Schiff advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported various environmental initiatives, including tax incentives for renewable energy and stricter emissions regulations.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Adam Schiff advocates for stricter firearms regulation, including measures for background checks and bans on assault weapons. He has consistently voted in favor of gun control legislation.
Adam Schiff advocates for stricter firearms regulation, including measures for background checks and bans on assault weapons. He has consistently voted in favor of gun control legislation.
“Ban assault weapons and cheap pistols. (Jan 2001)”
Adam Schiff supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for expanded access to healthcare services and funding for programs like Medicare and CHIP.
Adam Schiff supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for expanded access to healthcare services and funding for programs like Medicare and CHIP.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Adam Schiff supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for various education funding initiatives, including significant investments in green public schools.
Adam Schiff supports more federal funding for public schools and has voted for various education funding initiatives, including significant investments in green public schools.
“Voted YES on $40B for green public schools. (May 2009)”
Adam Schiff supports expanding ballot access and has voted against measures that would restrict voting rights, advocating for automatic voter registration and easier access to the polls.
Adam Schiff supports expanding ballot access and has voted against measures that would restrict voting rights, advocating for automatic voter registration and easier access to the polls.
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Adam Schiff has expressed support for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has a mixed record on criminal justice reform, advocating for measures that reduce recidivism and improve re-entry services for offenders.
Adam Schiff has expressed support for reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has a mixed record on criminal justice reform, advocating for measures that reduce recidivism and improve re-entry services for offenders.
“Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance. (Mar 2007)”
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Aid, Taxes, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation.
Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Supports right to choose. (Jan 2001)”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position on legal access to abortion.
Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“No photo IDs to vote; they suppress the vote. (Jun 2014)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Vote Without Fear Act directly supports expanding voting rights and enhancing voter access, aligning perfectly with the stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Maternal Health Pandemic Response Act directly supports expanding healthcare access and improving public health, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Supports right to choose. (Jan 2001)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for access to safe and legal abortion without restrictions.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: Cosponsoring the No Passes for Polluters Act directly supports the stated commitment to enforce limits on CO2 emissions and promote accountability for polluters, aligning with the advocacy for strong climate change policies.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: Sponsoring the Preparing Superfund for Climate Change Act directly supports the stated commitment to strong climate change policies and aligns with efforts to address environmental issues.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports expanded access to healthcare services for immigrant families, which aligns with the broader advocacy for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2479)
“Ban assault weapons and cheap pistols. (Jan 2001)”
Why: The concurrent resolution emphasizes reducing gun violence and enhancing public safety, which aligns with the advocate's support for stricter gun control measures.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Why: Cosponsoring the Midwives for MOMS Act supports expanding healthcare access for mothers, aligning with the stated position on enhancing healthcare access.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: Cosponsoring the America the Beautiful Act supports conservation and climate initiatives, aligning with the stated commitment to strong climate change policies.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: The act promotes innovative farming practices that can contribute to sustainability and climate resilience, aligning with the broader goals of strong climate change policies.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: The bill addresses operational standards for offshore oil and gas, which could have environmental implications, but does not directly advance the stated goal of cutting emissions.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance. (Mar 2007)”
Why: The action does not directly address drug offenses or criminal penalties, but it relates to broader criminal justice issues, making the relationship unclear.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Why: The action supports inclusivity and outreach in healthcare but does not directly address expanding access or enhancing existing programs as stated in the position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: The act addresses an environmental issue related to invasive species, but does not directly advance broader climate change policies or renewable energy initiatives.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
“Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. (Jun 2009)”
Why: The sponsorship of the Energy Cost Fairness and Reliability Act does not clearly align with strong climate policies, as the specifics of the bill's provisions are not detailed, leaving its impact on CO2 emissions and renewable energy unclear.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Why: The BRAIN Act focuses on brain research and innovation, which aligns with healthcare interests but does not directly address expanding access or drug pricing.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Voted YES on expanding the Children's Health Insurance Program. (Jan 2009)”
Why: The action to cosponsor the Keeping Obstetrics Local Act does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on expanding healthcare access, as the specifics of the bill's impact on access are unclear.
Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on $40B for green public schools. (May 2009)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
“Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance. (Mar 2007)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $40B for green public schools. (May 2009)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $40B for green public schools. (May 2009)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“Voted YES on $40B for green public schools. (May 2009)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 118. (consideration: CR S2250-2255)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2177-2178)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Voted YES on $40B for green public schools. (May 2009)”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance. (Mar 2007)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 50. Record Vote Number: 113. (consideration: CR S2156-2158)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Reduce recidivism by giving offenders a Second Chance. (Mar 2007)”
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 154.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2181-2182)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2179-2180)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2083)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.